The problem with ‘Stand Your Ground’February 23, 2014 at 10:37 pm | Posted in Disinformation, Fairness, Judicial Misjudgment | 7 Comments
Tags: ALEC, American Legislative Exchange Council, Facebook, George Zimmerman, gun control, guns, Jordan Davis, Mark Zuckerberg, Michael Dunn, Sierra Club, Stand Your Ground, Trayvon Martin
In both cases, the killer’s excuse was that he thought that the young black man had a gun.
The problem with ‘stand your ground’ laws is that it is too easy to claim that you feared that the person you shot had a weapon, and was about to use it on you.
You can claim this even if it wasn’t true. You can make up your fear after the fact.
No one can ever disprove your claim, because it rests only on what you say you believed at the time. Your claim need not depend upon on any externally confirmable matter of fact.
This is one of the most easily-abused legal ideas of all time.
One of the leading pushers of ‘stand your ground’ laws is ALEC. Besides promoting ‘stand your ground’ laws, ALEC (the American Legislative Exchange Council) acts as a mouthpiece for those who see short-term financial gains in delaying recognition of human-caused global warming. According to the Sierra Club, Mark Zuckerberg recently had Facebook join ALEC, because he wants its support for some of his own agendas. (The Sierra Club is urging everyone to sign a petition asking Mark Zuckerberg to withdraw Facebook from that unscrupulous organization.)
Although it is obvious, it bears repeating: neither of the unjustified killings that were cited above would have occurred if the killer hadn’t happened to have a gun handy.
If you wish to comment on this post but do not see a box where you can submit a comment, that is because WordPress includes the mechanism for commenting only on the page for the individual posting, never on the page that shows all of the recent postings. So click here, scroll to the bottom of the post, and submit your comment.