Morsi and Putin
July 24, 2013 at 7:17 pm | Posted in Abuse of Office, Conceited, Enemies of Freedom | Leave a commentTags: autocracy, democracy, Egypt, Egyptian Army, Islamic Brotherhood, Morsi, Putin, Rusiia

Mohamed Morsi, photographed at on May 8, 2013 by Wilson Dias for Agência Brasil, during Morsi’s reception by President Dilma Rousseff, of Brazil.
The original image has been turned upside down.
Before he was overthrown, the former President of Egypt, Morsi
– “temporarily granted himself unlimited powers to “protect” the nation in late November 2012″
– granted himself “the power to legislate without judicial oversight or review of his acts”
– rammed through changes to the Constitution that would favor himself and his former party, which represented the Islamic Brotherhood.
(The quotes are from an article in Wikipedia.)
Morsi’s overthrow was not undemocratic. His overthrow did not undermine the rule of law. It was not a coup: Morsi’s acts were the coup.
In the long run, if Eygpt’s military lives up to its promises, Morsi’s overthrow will have protected the rule of law.
Overthrowing Morsi was just and necessary, because Morsi was acting more and more like Putin.

Official portrait of Vladimir Putin (2006). This file comes from the website of the President of the Russian Federation and is copyrighted.
An Historic Opportunity for Egypt’s Military
July 8, 2013 at 1:54 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a commentTags: Abigail Hauslohner, autocracy, democracy, Egypt, Egyptian Army, Islamic Brotherhood, Jack H. G. Darrant, Morsi, The Political Idealist, Washington Post

Mohamed Morsi, photographed at on May 8, 2013 by Wilson Dias for Agência Brasil, during Morsi’s reception by President Dilma Rousseff, of Brazil.
The original image has been turned upside down.
Until this week, Egypt’s military seemed fated to appear in the history books as being blind to the benefits of democracy and of an open society, and as interested only in its own welfare and power.
Its removal of the undemocratic, autocratic, coercive Morsi regime and the Islamic Brotherhood from power suddenly offers the prospect that Egypt’s military can now end up being recognized as truly patriotic, as the friend and defender of democracy and of an open society, and therefore as the defender of the true interests of Egypt.
Although Morsi and the Islamicists were elected, they were elected because the majority that opposes their policies did not understand what was at stake in the election, nor the need for political organization. Many did not vote. The secularist opposition was fragmented. This is well described in an article by Abigail Hauslohner in the Washington Post.
That was because during that election, democracy was new to Egypt. The results of the election were not the results of a functioning democracy. The overthrow of Morsi and the Islamicists was not an assault on democracy. Jack H. G. Darrant, whose blog The Political Idealist is noted for its rigorous analyses, came to the same conclusion.
Egypt has learned a lot as a result of seeing Morsi and the Islamicists in action. Morsi and the Islamicists do not understand and value democracy and an open society, do not want to understand, and never will understand. They are autocrats at heart.
Egypt’s military has given Egypt a new chance to build a thriving, open society.
Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.