What is Art?

February 13, 2014 at 5:29 pm | Posted in Brain and mind | Leave a comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Alfred Sisley, The innondation at Port Marly, painted 1876. Presently in le Musée des beaux-arts de Rouen.

Alfred Sisley, The innondation at Port Marly, painted 1876. Presently in le Musée des beaux-arts de Rouen.

Art is anything that is contrived to elicit strong sensations in ourselves or in others.

What makes a deliberately created something into art, is that it is evocative.

That means that it resonates with something in the viewer’s or hearer’s brain, like a wine glass resonating to the sound of a violin, or a window of a house resonantly vibrating – buzzing – to the sound of a motor.

Anything that tries to play, like a musical instrument, the nervous systems of those who are exposed to it, is art.

That includes painting, sculpture, architecture, dance, acting, literature, and rhetoric (in its classical, general, not-necessarily-pejorative meaning): speeches, persuasive writing, informative writing, advertising, and even demogoguery.

But each brain is different – different experiences, different wiring- so what is evoked is different.

To some extent the impact of a work of art is measured not by what is evoked in each person, but by how many respond, and how strongly.

Here is a list of artistic activities.  Many of them are not usually thought of as being artistic.  Some give pleasure, others are deliberately unpleasant.  Some are evil.  But in each case you should easily be able to identify the presence of the defining characteristic of art, namely, the deliberate attempt to play the brains of the audience as if those brains were musical instruments.  In some cases  the intended audience is just the artist.  The redundancies in the list are there to better make a point.
– Humor, including stand-up comedy and informal jokes
– Circus acts
– Performing astounding feats for films or for on-line videos (attempts to impress or amuse, or to do both at the same time)
– Thoughtful photography
– Music, drawing and painting, sculpture, dance
(includes feats of art that are designed to impress as well as to please or inform: items featured on the Twisted Sifter, Cirque de Soleil)
– Fiction and expository non-fiction (written, or acted, or cartooned)
– Comic books, graphic novels, cartoon films
– Textbooks, instructional materials, user’s manuals,
– Web interfaces, other digital interfaces (such as those to an operating system or a programming language)
– All rhetoric in the classical non-pejorative sense: speech or other media that are designed to persuade
– Religious tales (Abraham and Isaac, David and Goliath, the birth, life and crucifixion of Jesus, Mohammed on a flying horse)
– Political claims, both true and false
– Demagoguery
– Advertising
– The deliberate giving of sexual or other sensual pleasure (to one’s self or to another), e.g., sensual massage, masturbation, erotica, sexual fantasies
– Its opposite: the deliberate imposition of pain, e.g., torture
– Fantasies, daydreams (but not involuntary dreams)
– Dressing for effect, couture, make-up
– Planning and hosting a party or other event
– Interior design and decoration, architecture, landscape design
– The design, crafting and wearing of costumes, dressing up (including for Halloween), jewelry
– Sports, including gladiatorial sports (boxing, wrestling, mixed martial arts)
– Ceremonies, rituals
– Public punishment (including executions)
– All entertainment
– The shock-and-awe component of terrorist acts (another type of attempt to impress)
– Intimidation, bullying

Clearly, we are an artistic species.

Clearly, not all art is benign.

All art is manipulative, even when the person being manipulated is the artist/daydreamer/fantasist.

Not all art has humans as its intended audience.  Art for pets and other non-human animals: pleasant environments for pets (wheels and tunnels and hiding places in a cage for hamsters), the design and operation of of zoos, …

In the future, not all art will have biologically evolved beings as its sole intended audience.  There will even be art and entertainment for autonomous robots.

Any deliberate attempt to strum the strings of a brain as if they were the strings of a musical instrument is art.  The brain may be the artist’s own, or someone else’s, or both.  The brain may be biological or artificial (designed).

But not all such attempts attain their goal.

If an attempt does attain its goal, it is good as art, whether or not it is also good ethically and morally.

All art requires the artist to mentally mirror the minds in the intended audience.
For such an attempt to resonate with the brains of a wide audience, the ‘musician’ and the audience must share a culture, or mental mechanisms (e.g., adult humans affecting human babies or animals, or animals affecting animals), or the musician must at least be familiar with how the members of the target population respond.

Some non-contrived stimuli elicit the same sensations as art: sunsets, scenery, a flower, a baby, a puppy or a kitten.  They elicit the same stimuli as art,  because they share parts of the same processing paths in the brain.

Because we live at a stage of evolution when we are familiar with the concepts of an artist and of art, those sensations may also make us feel to that the  evocative stimuli were created by an artist.

To a being who had not been exposed to the concept of an artist, the same stimuli might be just as evocative, without suggesting that they were due to an artist.

.
If you wish to comment on this post but do not see a box where you can submit a comment, that is because WordPress includes the mechanism for commenting only on the page for the individual posting, never on the page that shows all of the recent postings.  So click here, scroll to the bottom of the post, and submit your comment.

Consciousness and Attention

October 28, 2013 at 7:41 pm | Posted in Brain and mind | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Meditating in Madison Square Park, Manhattan, New York City, photographed 22 June 2010 by Beyond My Ken .

Meditating in Madison Square Park, Manhattan, New York City, photographed 22 June 2010 by Beyond My Ken .

The previous post suggested a framework for thinking about the phenomenon of consciousness.  The same framework can suggest measurements to test hypotheses about the mechanisms of consciousness, and tell us the values of the parameters in those mechanisms.

The suggested framework asserts that consciousness is closely related to attention.  Specifically, consciousness occurs when a multitude of processors in the brain are all paying attention to the same set of inputs to the brain.  Typically, some of those inputs are the result of the processing of signals from sensory nerves by smaller numbers of pre-processors; the pre-processing is therefore unconscious.  (For example, in vision, one of the pre-processors identifies edges.)  Other inputs are signals from the brain itself about other signals from the brain itself.  These meta-signals are called ‘thoughts’.  Depending upon the identities and number of processors that are paying attention to a thought, it will or will not be a conscious thought.  The special feature of consciousness is that the relevant multitude of processors are all paying attention to all of the momentary subjects of consciousness at the same time.

We do not yet know the identities and number of the processors whose simultaneous attention is needed for making a signal a subject of conscious attention.  We don’t even know whether the relevant processors are always the same, or vary with the subjects of consciousness.  Techniques that image the location of increased activity in the brain could test the suggested framework, and if it proves useful, they could identify the relevant processors.

Some of the needed data may already be available, and just need to be re-analyzed to answer these new questions.

Caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI : These fMRI images are from a study showing parts of the brain lighting up on seeing houses and other parts on seeing faces. The 'r' values are correlations, with higher positive or negative values indicating a better match.  Image from the US National Institute for Mental Health.

Caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FMRI : These fMRI images are from a study showing parts of the brain lighting up on seeing houses and other parts on seeing faces. The ‘r’ values are correlations, with higher positive or negative values indicating a better match. Image from the US National Institute for Mental Health.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) shows which regions of the brain receive increased blood flow when a person receives a particular stimulus.  (Many interesting fMRI scans can be viewed here , but most of the pictures of fMRI reached via that URL are copyrighted, and so cannot be re-used. )

Daniel G. Amen has developed a large collection of single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) scans of brains of people performing mental tasks.  Regardless of what you think of the utility of these images for diagnosing ADD and related conditions, this collection could be a treasure trove for scientific research on the locations of increased brain activity during various mental tasks.  Each measurement takes roughly 10 minutes, so the technique may not be able to capture what happens while the brain shifts its attention from one subject to another.  Also the spatial resolution of SPECT is not as good as that of fMRI.  But the large size of the database makes the SPECT data a potentially valuable supplement to other kinds of data.
Rebecca Saxe, at MIT, has developed techniques for non-invasively localizing the changing distribution of activity in the human brain when a person is shown stimuli and then responds to questions.  The techniques were developed and then applied to provide data on the scientifically, socially and legally important topic of how we infer what other people are thinking.  Her techniques would also be useful for providing data on attention.  A non-technical video presentation of her work can be viewed by visiting http://scicolloq.gsfc.nasa.gov/GSFCWeb_Fall2012.html , then clicking on the line  ”Nov. 2   Rebecca Saxe   Massachusetts Institute of Technology  How We Think about Other People’s Thoughts   V”, and then clicking on the ‘V’ (for ‘video’) at the far right.

A new technique, multi-photon microscopy, is being developed to nondestructively image in 3D the top millimeter or so of the living brain, with much better spatial resolution than the other techniques, but without being able to image as deep as the other techniques.  (See. for example, Ke Wang, Nicholas G. Gorton, Chris Xu, “Going Deep: Brain Imaging with Multi-Photon Microscopy”, Optics and Photonics News, volume 24, number 11, pp.32-39, November 2013.)

Typical questions about consciousness that might be answered by techniques that image the changing pattern of activity in the brain are:

– When conscious attention is trained on more than one subject, are the signals about the ever-changing status of those diverse subjects multiplexed onto a single serial communications channel?  Or do they travel via parallel communication channels?  Which processor receives the information?  If the information arrives multiplexed onto a serial communication channel, how is it de-multiplexed and distributed amongst the processors that can do something with the information on a particular subject?

– Since conscious attention can be trained on more than one subject, there must be special processors in the brain that decide (1) when a new subject should be admitted to conscious attention (“That car has suddenly come very close to us!”), (2) whether a current subject of conscious attention must be relegated to unconscious attention to make room for the new subject, or simply because it no longer merits conscious attention, and (3) when a subject of conscious attention suddenly merits undivided attention.  Where are those special processors?  What auxiliary signals do they use in arriving at their decisions?  What neural pathways are activated to carry the current information about a particular subject into conscious attention, or to transfer that information to a processor that receives only unconscious attention?
– Meditation (more accurately, of mindfulness) seems to have many benefits.  Why?  Is it restorative for the brain to not have to divide its attention amongst multiple subjects for a while?  Is the relief due to the temporary suspension of the metabolic and processing burdens needed for managing and monitoring more than one subject of conscious attention?

– You are talking with someone, but become momentarily distracted by your own thoughts, and don’t consciously hear something that was said.  You soon  realize that you missed something important, but you are reluctant to admit that you hadn’t paid attention.  If you recognize the problem soon enough, sometimes you can recall what you hadn’t consciously heard.  How does your brain identify the relevant unconscious processor, and bring its contents into conscious attention?

 

If you wish to comment on this post but do not see a box where you can submit a comment, that is because WordPress includes the mechanism for commenting only on the page for the individual posting, never on the page that shows all of the recent postings.  So click here, scroll to the bottom of the post, and submit your comment.

 

What is Consciousness?

October 20, 2013 at 8:54 pm | Posted in Brain and mind | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
The caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain : The main anatomical regions of the vertebrate brain, shown for shark and human. The same parts are present, but they differ greatly in size and shape.  Image by Looie496, 2011-09-30 .

The caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain : The main anatomical regions of the vertebrate brain, shown for shark and human. The same parts are present, but they differ greatly in size and shape. Image by Looie496, 2011-09-30 .

Imagine placing your hands near the sensor of an automatic faucet, or getting up from a self-flushing toilet, or approaching at night a building whose front light is turned on and off by a motion sensor.

The faucet turns on, the toilet flushes, the building’s front light turns on.

In each case, a signal was sent from a sensor to an operating device.  But the recipient of the signal operated automatically, without being conscious of the signal, nor of its own response.  It detected the signal, but did not feel it.  It did not tingle, or wince, or become happy or sad.  It sensed the signal, but had no sensation – a seemingly paradoxical statement that is actually meaningful and accurate, because of the vagueness of human language.  (The vagueness is often useful and efficient, but that is another story.)  It was aware of the signal in a limited sense, but was not aware of the signal in the vivid way that a person would be aware of a pin prick, for example.

Now imagine that you are pricked by a pin.  The signal from nerves in your skin travels to your brain.  One result is an automatic reflex: you draw back, unless you consciously over-rule that reflex.  But another result is your vivid awareness of the pin prick.  You feel it.  It produces a sensation, at nearly the same time as your reflex.  You are conscious of it.

Conscious awareness seems to activate many of your brain systems at the same time: emotions, your model of how the world works, memories, your expectations of what happens next.  Apparently, a message was broadcast to a large part of your brain.  That seems to be what is distinctive about conscious sensation, or a conscious thought (viewed as a signal from within your own brain).  It is likely that conscious awareness of something is synonymous with “all or most of brain knows about it, and is paying attention to it”.

That is a testable hypothesis.  Brain imaging, such as functional MRI (fMRI) could test it.

Caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain : Regions of the cerebral cortex associated with pain.  Authors: Borsook D, Moulton EA, Schmidt KF, Becerra LR., © 2007 Borsook et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Caption on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pain : Regions of the cerebral cortex associated with pain. Authors: Borsook D, Moulton EA, Schmidt KF, Becerra LR., © 2007 Borsook et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

If conscious awareness of something is indeed synonymous with “all or most of brain knows about it, and is paying attention to it”, that would explain why we can be aware of – conscious of – only a limited number of items at the same time.  Any one conscious item requires the attention of much of the brain.  Each item occupies many resources, and there are only a limited number of them available.

That the limiting number of items is roughly seven for most individuals is an accident of our evolved wet-ware.  We can handle more simultaneous factors by building artificial intelligent systems.

If this view of the nature of consciousness is correct, then consciousness has a cultural analog.  In a family, a business, a village, a nation, a scientific or other cultural community, the analog of an object of conscious awareness is anything that becomes part of the general culture of that group of people.

It is clarifying to consider the sensations of pain and of pleasure.  What does it mean to feel pain or pleasure?

Among the sensations, pain and pleasure were probably the first to evolve.  These two sensations are the most helpful ones for helping an individual to survive long enough to produce descendents.  Darwin noted the evolutionary utility of experiencing pleasure from satisfying hunger, and the evolutionary utility of the unpleasantness of feeling hunger.  (See p.64 of The Autobiography of Charles Darwin and Selected Letters, edited by Frances Darwin, reprinted 1958 by Dover Publications.)

To be useful, pain or pleasure must activate most or all of the systems in the brain to avoid something or some situation, or to seek more of it.  We must react and act in manifold ways to avoid the threat or to seek the reward.  An ever-varying mix of the systems in our brain must work in a coordinated fashion.  So the signals that elicit the sensations of pain and of pleasure must be broadcast to much of the brain.

This is unlike the distribution of most of the signals from the nerves to the brain.  Most signals affect only a few systems in the brain.  It is not a coincidence that they also do not register in our consciousness: they are not felt by us, they do not produce sensations.

There is an evolutionary benefit to widely broadcasting to the brain only certain types of signals.  Signals about things to avoid and things to seek are among them.  So are any signals that require a versatile, coordinated response by many systems in the brain.

There is an evolutionary benefit to not widely broadcasting any signals that do not require a versatile, coordinated response by many systems in the brain.

Our brains seem to interpret any widely broadcast signal as a sensation, as a feeling, and as consciously perceived.

There was a clear evolutionary advantage to developing neurochemical mechanisms that activate, respectively, a general avoidance of a thing or situation, or a general seeking for more of it, that is, for developing mechanisms for feeling pain and pleasure, that is, for experiencing them consciously.

[By the way, the mechanisms that produce an urge for avoidance seem to be distinct from those that urge us to seek a situation, because some stimuli can elicit both urges at the same time.  Examples are hot peppers, strong drink, a horror movie, thrill seeking.  (‘Strong drink’ is oddly named, since it for the weak.)]

The other sensations probably evolved as outgrowths of those two fundamental sensations.  So the neurochemical mechanisms that produce the sensations of pain and of pleasure are the root of basic consciousness.

If a sensation is tagged by a location on the body, we feel pain or pleasure that we associate with a finger, or with our tongue, a tooth, our genitals, our gut.

Once the mechanisms for basic consciousness are available, higher consciousness can evolve or be built in, by adding mechanisms for the mental mirroring of other individual animals (and of artificial intelligences, if needed), then of groups of them, and, eventually, also of inanimate objects, as explained in an earlier post.  Before a biologically evolved or built species develops mechanisms for mirroring, its abilities increase by relatively small steps.  But once it has developed mechanisms for mirroring, the increases in its capabilities can compound, and, like compound interest, grow exponentially.

Great versatility is conferred by activating many systems in the brain, that then act together in coordinated ways that adapt to the changing incoming signals. .  Obtaining that evolutionary advantage required developing felt sensations (feelings), and, more generally, consciousness.  Feelings motivate action by assigning values to outcomes: avoid => bad, seek => good.  After much extension (caused by the development of mental mirroring) of the scope of application of sensations and consciousness, the development of values as felt motivators led to our sense of right and wrong, of good and evil, of morality, of fairness, and hence of justice, and enlarged our emotional lives.

Two comments about consciousness:

1 – The concepts of cruelty and of kindness pertain to our actions toward the members of any species whose individuals feel, experiencing pain and pleasure.  The species can be biological, or it can be artificial.  Plants do not feel.  It seems certain that paramecia and amoeba do not feel.  But the frantic wriggling of a worm suggests that it feels pain, and is not merely manifesting a reflex.  If so, it has basic consciousness, despite not having much of a brain.  As for the scurrying cockroach, the spider, the spider’s prey, we do not know yet.  More certainly, pain seems to be felt by the wriggling fish impaled by a hook in its mouth, or with its body grasped by the bill of a heron.  We need to invent a way to tell, because feeling pain and/or pleasure confers moral status, as vegetarians know.

2 – There is an common confusion about consciousness.  We are often said to be unconscious while we sleep.  That may be true during non-REM sleep, but it is not true during a dream.  A dream amounts to being conscious – aware – of certain internal signals, and to attempting to make sense of those signals,  while not being conscious of most, or all, of the signals from our environment.

See also these posts: here, and here.

New Navy and Marine Corps officers during the graduation of the class of 2011 at the U.S. Naval Academy. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Chad Runge/Released.

New Navy and Marine Corps officers during the graduation of the class of 2011 at the U.S. Naval Academy. U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 1st Class Chad Runge/Released.

 

If you wish to comment on this post but do not see a box where you can submit a comment, that is because WordPress includes the mechanism for commenting only on the page for the individual posting, never on the page that shows all of the recent postings.  So click here, scroll to the bottom of the post, and submit your comment.

The Easy Way to Understand More, and Better

May 17, 2013 at 3:44 pm | Posted in Practical tips | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Albert Einstein during a lecture in Vienna in 1921. Photograph by Ferdinand Schmutzer (1870–1928).

Albert Einstein during a lecture in Vienna in 1921. Photograph by Ferdinand Schmutzer (1870–1928).

Biographies, and then histories, are the pleasantest way to learn more, to understand more, and to understand better: any science, mathematics, politics, business, literature, the performing arts (including sports), and the military arts.  Biographies and histories are a useful supplement even for the studio arts.

Biographies, and then histories, are extremely effective aids to mastering new material.

Biographies and histories are narratives.  Our brains have evolved to be especially good at digesting narratives, and in basing actions on predictions of how narratives will play out.

It is easy to see why this is so.

Tyler's Tree Frog (Litoria tyleri).  Photo by LiquidGhoul (2006-01-10 (first version); 2007-03-07 (last version)).  Photo by LiquidGhoul.

Tyler’s Tree Frog (Litoria tyleri). Photo by LiquidGhoul (2006-01-10 (first version); 2007-03-07 (last version)). Photo by LiquidGhoul.

Consider a frog watching a fly swooping and buzzing almost within range of the frog’s tongue.  The frog’s brain has evolved the ability to fairly accurately guess where the fly will be next.  It does so by constructing scenarios in its brain, and playing them out there, conciously or unconciously.

Packsaddle (Kløv på Siberian Husky), photographed by Per Harald Olsen (Perhols)

Packsaddle (Kløv på Siberian Husky), photographed by Per Harald Olsen (Perhols)

A sleeping dog sometimes moves its legs, or even whimpers or growls.  It is dreaming.  A scenario is playing out in its brain.

President Reagan holds a oval office staff meeting on his first full day in office (from left to right) Deputy Chief of Staff Michael Deaver, Counsellor to the President Ed Meese, Chief of Staff James Baker III, Press Secretary James Brady, President Reagan, 1981  (http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/photo.html; Courtesy Reagan Library, PD).

President Reagan holds a oval office staff meeting on his first full day in office (from left to right) Deputy Chief of Staff Michael Deaver, Counsellor to the President Ed Meese, Chief of Staff James Baker III, Press Secretary James Brady, President Reagan, 1981
(http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/photographs/photo.html; Courtesy Reagan Library, PD).

Photo by Dennis Crowley. Here is a kitchen view during Wednesday night's green tea party, 30 May 2008, 10:07:15, Author: Nick Gray

Photo by Dennis Crowley. Here is a kitchen view during Wednesday night’s green tea party, 30 May 2008, 10:07:15, Author: Nick Gray

Picture taken at at Masters of Lindy Hop and Tap, Century Ballroom, Oddfellows Temple, Pine Street, Capitol Hill, Seattle, Washington, USA. At the tail end of the Friday night Masters' Exhibition, there was a general invitation to the audience to come up and dance. This picture was taken during that period. Photo by Joe Mabel/Century Ballroom, 14 August 2009.

Picture taken at at Masters of Lindy Hop and Tap, Century Ballroom, Oddfellows Temple, Pine Street, Capitol Hill, Seattle, Washington, USA. At the tail end of the Friday night Masters’ Exhibition, there was a general invitation to the audience to come up and dance. This picture was taken during that period. Photo by Joe Mabel/Century Ballroom, 14 August 2009.

2006 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event Table, 22 May 2007, http://www.lasvegasvegas.com/photogallery/3719-lg.jpg, Author: Photos by flipchip / LasVegasVegas.com

2006 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event Table, 22 May 2007, http://www.lasvegasvegas.com/photogallery/3719-lg.jpg, Author: Photos by flipchip / LasVegasVegas.com

We are a social species, and moreover do not have our responses hard-wired, but create them on the fly.  We must continually guess what other people know about us and about the rest of the world, and what they want to accomplish.  We do so by imagining scenarios, usually consciously, but sometimes unconsciously.  We have built upon the scenario-building skills of our evolutionary ancestor-species, and our scenarios can be much more sophisticated than theirs, often resulting in greater predictive skill and longer predictive lead-times.

Our proclivity for making scenarios is so great that we do so in day dreams, in night dreams, in literature (broadly construed: including plays and movies, and childrens games, and fantasies).  Our day dreams and our night dreams are not snapshots, they are movies: scenarios playing themselves out.  Sometimes we put considerable care and expense into creating scenarios: war games involving many people, or practicing and rehearsing a presentation to an individual or to a group, or for an upcoming job interview.

Dogs, our most social companion species, have evolved to be intensely interested in our feelings and intentions about them, as individuals.  So most dogs become rather good at reading us, and at anticipating our reactions.  By observing our behavior they are able to accurately imagine scenarios involving us.  So they become sneaky, hiding evidence of actions that they know we wouldn’t like, or they act embarrassed when they know we will be unhappy with them, or they bring us their leash or make noises with their food bowl, or wake us up and whine when something unsettling has appeared in the house, such as smoke in the air.

Cats, a less social companion species, do this less so.  But house cats vary greatly, and some individuals act rather dog-like.

So now you see why narratives are a particularly congenial way for us to learn and to understand.

Read biographies first, then histories.  Biographies are vivid.  We can more easily relate to an individual (with affection, sympathy or disgust) than to crowd. A biography acquaints us with the flavor of a time and place.  A biography gives us questions about the person’s context: customs, prevailing scarcities, politics.  That prior knowledge and those questions provide a structure upon which we can hang the more general information provided by a history.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.