Was David Eisenhauer a Jekyll-Hyde-like psychopath?
February 11, 2016 at 8:25 pm | Posted in Uncategorized | 4 CommentsTags: Blacksburg, bullying, David Eisenhauer, DeNeen L. Brown, Fenit Nirappil, Justin Juvenal, Moriah Balingit, murder, Natalie M. Keepers, Nick Anderson, Nicole Lovell, Petula Dvorak, sex offender, sex with a minor, Shawn Boburg, T. Rees Shapiro, Virginia Tech
You probably have heard the horrifying story. (If not, you can read about its various aspects here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here.)
A sweet, cheerful, friendly, affectionate young girl, Nicole Lovell, in Blacksburg, Virginia, had overcome challenges that most of us will never face. She overcame lymphoma (a type of cancer), had a liver transplant, and a trachoetomy. The tracheotomy left a scar on Nicole’s throat.
Doing so took courage, fortitude, the strength of character to overcome fear, to endure physical pain. It entailed loneliness from being separated from her friends. It caused her unease about falling behind her classmates. What she did was nothing short of heroic. Her parents were subjected to staggering burdens, which they lovingly accepted.
The tracheotomy scar and Nicole’s medical absences from school made her the target of bullying and snubs at her middle school.
That, and her entry into adolescence, made her eager for a boyfriend. She sought one on social media. At 13 years old, in middle school, she thought she had found one, David Eisenhauer, 18 years old, an athlete and accomplished student at nearby Virginia Tech. She was proud and happy: she now had a handsome affectionate defender, and a living proof that she was lovable and attractive. For a girl in middle school, he was a trophy. She dreamt of starting a family with him. She spoke of running away with him.
At some point they had sex. At some point David Eisenhauer decided to kill her. He and a friend of his, Natalie M. Keepers, plotted for a month on where and how to do it. They bought a shovel. He had a knife. They selected a secluded spot on campus.
In November 2015, David arranged for Nichole to sneak out of her house to meet him in secret.
On the night of November 27, 2015, she climbed out of her bedroom window to meet him. She must have been happily excited and eager: she had even told a friend that she was going to run away with him (but not when). At some secluded location David stabbed Nicole to death. He and Natalie took Nicole’s body a little across the border of North Carolina and buried her.
Was David Eisenhauer a Jekyll-Hyde-like psychopath?
No, not according to what his roomate and others say.
Why then did he plot with a friend, for a month, to cold-bloodedly murder a sweet, trusting, affectionate young girl, Nicole Lovell, who adored and trusted him?
Here is a guess.
According to those who knew him, David Eisenhauer is intelligent, and is focused on the future.
He knew he had made a very serious mistake when, probably in a moment of weakness, he had earlier had sex with Nicole Lovell. Since she was a juvenile and he was not, if their sexual activities ever became known, he would be classed as a sex offender who took advantage of an under-age girl. For the rest of his life he would have to declare himself to the local police wherever he lived, and he would have to obey restrictions that barred him from proximity to schools and playgrounds, and even those used by his potential future children. If the sensible proposal to mark the passports of sex-offenders is eventually approved, some countries would thereafter deny him entry. He would be shamed in the eyes of his parents, friends, and classmates. Even his family would be disgusted by him, and would feel let down by him, and would even feel shame at having raised him.
Because of the bullying she had suffered, Nicole Lovell had a pattern of boasting about any evidence that she was lovable and attractive. In particular, she had boasted about him, on social media, and Nicole Lovell’s friends knew about him. David Eisenhauer knew that it was only a matter of time before Nicole boasted to her friends about having sex with him, and then that damning fact would quickly become widely known. All the bad consequences would ensue.
So David Eisenhauer felt that he had no choice but to silence Nicole Lovell by killing her.
He revealed his quandry and his plans to fellow student Natalie M. Keepers, a close and supportive friend, and enlisted her help.
We know what happened next. David Eisenhauer compounded his earlier serious crime of having sex with a minor by the far more serious crime of murder.
But suppose the plot had succeeded, and the murderers had never been identified?
After the murder, the only person who knew David Eisenhauer’s secret was Natalie Keepers. She herself had in the past been bullied, and was somewhat unstable – perhaps as a result of the bullying. So she was the only remaining threat. She was emotionally unstable. She might blurt out the secret during some therapy session in the future, or during some future dispute with David Eisenhauer.
Natalie Keepers was lucky that she and David Eisenhauer were caught.
Most likely, David Eisenhauer still had the knife and the shovel.
The scenario described above is just a guess. But it could explain what had seemed inexplicable.
–
If you want to comment on this post, go here. To avoid cluttering the ‘latest postings’ page, WordPress includes the mechanism for commenting only on the page for the individual posting, never on the page that shows all of the recent postings. So click here, scroll to the bottom of the post, and submit your comment.
4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.
‘I Voted’ emblem
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2022
- August 2021
- May 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- June 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- October 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
Categories
- Abuse of Office
- Brain and mind
- Climate change
- Conceited
- Crime and punishment
- Disinformation
- Dysfunctional Politics
- Enemies of Freedom
- Enemies of Planet Earth
- Fairness
- Global warming
- Good books
- Good People
- Health and safety
- Humans and other animals
- Humor
- Judicial Injustice
- Judicial Misjudgment
- Practical tips
- Presidential election
- Privacy
- Scams and Malware
- Terrorism
- Uncategorized
Meta
Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.
That is super creepy. Poor girl. I can’t imagine what her family is still going through. Good thing they caught him! It’s hard to say what causes people to do such inexplicable things. They must have a screw loose somewhere!
Thanks for coming to the blog party! It’s not too late to hop to other blogs and say howdy do! Tell them “Susie sent me,” and they should click back to yours!
Comment by susielindau— February 15, 2016 #
This betrayal of a young, trusting girl had really stuck in my craw. It didn’t make sense, especially when the killer was so normal and even admirable in other respects. So this was an attempt to make sense of it. It was a tragedy in the Shakespearean sense. Ghastly for Nicole and for her family, but also tragic for the killer and his accomplice, and for their families. That is why the picture shows torrential tears.
Comment by thepoliblog— February 15, 2016 #
If the scenario posited in this post is correct, then, ironically, Nicole Lovell was murdered BECAUSE of the draconian laws that were intended to protect her – and other youngsters – from sexual predation by adults, who are more experienced and more confident than are young teenagers. I don’t know if the severe life-long penalties in those laws have reduced predation, but whether or not they have, the law of unintended consequences can certainly be expected to apply. The legal penalties were made more severe in hopes of reducing the cases of predation. But their very severity has dramatically increased the cost, to a predator, of allowing knowledge of the incident to become known. According to the scenario positited above, that was why a normal, accomplished student and athlete, felt that he had no choice but to murder Nicole.
We need more nuanced and flexible laws. How to improve the laws is presently unknown. But unless we find a better balance, the same forces that caused Nicole’s murder are guaranteed to act in additional instances, with the same tragic results.
Comment by thepoliblog— February 18, 2016 #
[…] previous posting on this blog tried to make sense of the murderer of a sweet, trusting, in-love teen age girl by a […]
Pingback by Two Monsters | thepoliblog— June 5, 2016 #